Work And The Good Life

Apr 9

Pick your Professor

What role should work play in your conception of eudaimonia? In this session, we will look at Karl Marx’s critical examination of work, focusing on his theories of class struggle and alienation. We’ll explore Marx’s ideas about how the commodification of labor can conflict with our pursuit of a good life and consider his vision of work’s potential to serve as a means of genuine self-fulfillment.

Read This:

Work and Identity: Karl Marx and Max Weber

Key Concepts:

  • Class struggle
  • Proletariat vs. bourgeoisie
  • Capitalism
  • Protestant work ethic

Have questions or thoughts about the reading? Post them on PollEverywhere, and upvote any classmates’ responses that you’d like to cover in class. We’ll address the most upvoted responses during the Q&A part of class.

Do This:

  • Complete Map to the Good Life Activity #5 by April 17.
  • Work on your Apology essay (due April 27).

Pre-Class Questions

Your responses to the following questions are due on Canvas before class. Your top 15 scores of the semester will count toward your final grade.

  1. Choose a workplace you are familiar with (for example, a local business you frequent, somewhere you’ve worked, etc.). Of everyone involved in running this business, who would Marx say belongs to the “proletariat” and who belongs to the “bourgeoisie”? Explain why. Is there anyone involved who is difficult to classify in these terms?
  2. In your own words, explain what Max Weber means by the “Protestant work ethic” and identify one aspect of society today that could be understood as an effect of it.
  3. In your own words, explain what Marx means by “communism” and how this differs from “capitalism”.

Map to the Good Life

This prompt will be one of your options to address in Activity #5 of Map to the Good Life, which will be due on April 17.

Find one piece of career advice that is common around Notre Dame (either from the career center or from advice other students give). Do you find this advice philosophically defensible? Why or why not? In your analysis, discuss at least one philosophical idea from today’s reading or lecture.